Essay about Thank God for the Atomic Bomb - 618 Words

Thank God for the Atomic Bomb In Paul Russell’s passage from Thank God for the Atomic Bomb, he describes how the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were fully necessary. Russell agrees with President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs because of the logical reasons. He gives examples that compare to the overall effect to America, and the positive things that happen to America such as the fact that the war would be over. I agree with Fussell’s opinion because the atomic bomb solved many problems in one shot, including and most importantly the war. Before Paul Russell was a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, he was an infantry lieutenant in World War II and has had first hand experiences about what happens at†¦show more content†¦Although, for me, it gives me enough information to tell me both sides, from looking at multiple resources I have come up with the idea that back then it was much more important for our country to win, and not only for â€Å"winningà ¢â‚¬  but for also the long term effects for America. In Paul Russell’s passage from Thank God for the Atomic Bomb, he describes how the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary. I too agree with this decision to drop the bomb because of the logos reasons. Russell completely agrees with President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs because of the logical reasons. He gives examples that compare to the overall effect to America, and the positive things that happen to America such as the fact that the war would be over. Russell’s decision shows his ethics in life, one may say that because he doesn’t seem to care about what happens to the Japanese he is cruel and cold. But he is thinking about the good of our country and you have to remember that during World War II the world was much more different than in the present. The ethics and morals were much more different than those in theShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Article Thank God Fo r The Atom Bomb 970 Words   |  4 PagesThe atom bomb is a bomb that derives its destructive power from the rapid release of nuclear energy by fission of heavy atomic nuclei, causing damage through heat, blast, and radioactivity. To create this weapon of mass destruction the government started the Manhattan Project and the main mastermind behind this project was Robert Oppenheimer. The project lasted from 1942 to 1946 and its goal was to create the first nuclear weapons for World War II. On August 6, 1945, the American bomber Enola GayRead MoreThe Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb During World War II760 Words   |  4 PagesAmanda Burnett 5/12/16 Justification of the Atomic Bomb Thesis: The dropping of the atomic bomb during World War II by the United States on Japan was a justified act. Not only was the dropping of the atomic bomb used to save American lives, but it prevented the war from lingering on, taking the lives of more civilians. The bomb did not just make sense, but it saved lives, despite taking some, therefore making the atomic bomb a reasonable action. It is not war mentality to think of preservingRead MoreThe Benefits of Dropping an Atomic Bomb on Japan Essay1279 Words   |  6 Pagessuffering, without suffering we would never learn from our mistakes. To make it right, pain and suffering is the key to windows, without it, there is no way of life.† On August 6, 1945 the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a small city whose death toll rises to 90,000-166,000. On August 9th, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, 60,000–80,000 . In total, 15 million people lost their lives during the duration of the Second World War. In John Herseys book, Hiroshima, he provides a detailed accountRead MoreThe Atomic Bombs910 Words   |  4 PagesDuring the 20th century, specifically the year 1945, the United States of America had two atomic bombs that the commander and chief, and president at the time, Harry Truman, knew about. President Truman plan was to drop the bombs on two of Japans cities, Hiroshima first and then Nagasaki. Truman’s plans went accordingly, which to this day leads to a very controversial topic on whether or not dropping the atomic bombs was a good or bad thing. There is evidence and reasoning to back up both claims, inRead MoreEssay on The Effects of the Atomic Bomb1601 Words   |  7 PagesThe Effects of the Atomic Bomb Some regard the atomic bomb as â€Å"the thank God for the atom bomb†. This places God on the U.S. side and regards the bombs as our saving grace. This bomb forced the Japanese to surrender which in turn proved the U.S. to be the heroes who saved the American’s lives.1 The Americans intended on ending the war but did not expect to end it with such a large number of casualties. The results of the atomic bomb and how it effected the Japanese people both emotionallyRead MoreThank God For The Atom Bomb973 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"Thank God for the Atom Bomb† is an essay wrote by Paul Fussell in 1981 during the forty-second anniversary of the atom-bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The title of the essay is very provocative since a lot of people consider those bombs as inhuman and unethical. However, Fussell, in his essay gives a different point of view. In other words he gives us a point of view of someone who was the in the middle of the combat and even got wounded fighting in France. In the introduction to his essay, FussellRead MoreA Monument Of The World War I1102 Words   |  5 PagesA Monument to Peace Inspired by War Grant Deetch Humanities 120 Professor Aaron Nusz October 10, 2015 On August the sixth 1945 a single nuclear bomb nicknamed â€Å"Little Boy† was dropped on the City of Hiroshima in Japan. Then on August the ninth 1945 another bomb, this time nicknamed â€Å"Fat Man† was dropped on the City of Nagasaki Japan. While it is well known that nuclear weapons were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Japan to bring World War Two to a decisive end, this piece of artRead MoreEssay about Nuclear Weapons Promote Religion2530 Words   |  11 Pages In some sort of crude sense which no vulgarity, no humor, no overstatement can quite extinguish, the physicists have known sin; and this is a knowledge which they cannot lose. J. Robert Oppenheimer (AJ Software and Multimedia. History of Atomic Bomb). nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The most destructive weapons every created in the world that in seconds kill up to 200,000 people and destroy a area two mile wide was created not by generals but scientists. It forced people to look at religionRead MoreEssay on Kurt Vonnegut’s novels Cat’s Cradle and Slaughterhouse-Five1365 Words   |  6 Pagesthat only gained importance because people made them worth fighting and killing for. Cat’s Cradle was written in 1963. This novel is the story of how and why the world ends. The story ironically has the creator of the atomic bombing ending the world, however not with an atomic bomb. Unknown to the world, Dr. Felix Hoenikker created a substance called Ice-Nine, a certain form of crystallized Hydrogen and Oxygen that when in contact with any other water, will freeze all water it touches, and turn itRead MoreThe Necessity Of The Atomic Bomb1841 Words   |  8 PagesThe necessity of the atomic bombs have long been debated in America. Although they did contribute to stopping the war, Americans still wonder if murdering Japanese civilians was a necessary means to an end, or if it could have been avoided. Some people believe that the war would have ended without using the bombs. Others believe they were the sole purpose that the war finally ended. Many people were involved with bringing the bombs to fruition, such as the scientists, the government and military

Post-WWI American Society Essay - 1124 Words

After the war, the American people made the change from old ways to new ways. Many factors, such as new technology, fundamentalism, new looks and church led to tension between the old and the new. The 1920s were a time of conflicting viewpoints between traditional behaviors and new and changing attitudes. New technology in the 1920s attributed to the change. Inventions such as the radio helped improve communication. Court trials, conventions, and meetings were broadcasted. Electrical appliances improved homes. In 1922, Sinclair Lewis wrote, These standard advertised wares- toothpastes, socks, tires, cameras, instantaneous hot-water heaters Ââ€" were his symbols and proofs of excellence, at first the signs, then the substitutes, for joy†¦show more content†¦Henry Ford was credited the most for the automobile. His assembly line made Model T was inexpensive and therefore was more available to the common man. New technology attributed to the new attitudes and demands. One of t he most changes was the new look for young women. The Flapper Era entered America. Ladies did the unthinkable in cutting their long hair to chin length bobs, smoking, wearing shorter dresses and even engaging in premarital sex. Traditional women were horrified at these loose morals and daring behavior. They pushed to stop the women reformers who pushed for legalized birth control. They spoke against the sensual behavior of young women. At this time marriage decreased and divorce increased because women became more independent Another source of tension was the difference in religious beliefs among people. A new way of thinking called Modernism emerged in which people took a slightly more critical look at the Bible. The people claimed to believe in the theory of evolution as opposed to the seven-day Creation story of Genesis. Fundamentalists, on the other hand, denounced this as blasphemy. These traditionalists took the word of the Bible as exact and literal. Nowhere was the conflict between these two parties more highlighted than in the Scopes Trial in Tennessee. John Scopes, a schoolteacher, had been arrested for teaching the theory of evolution to his students. He was eventually convicted (but laterShow MoreRelatedAmerican Society After The World War Era Essay1132 Words   |  5 PagesSociety was changing substantially within America, specifically during the World War eras. One must understand American society prior to WWI to note the significant changes that resulted in post-WWII society. Post-WWII society was dominated by the â€Å"culture of exclusion.† Essentially, the â€Å"culture of exclusion† excluded individuals from American society because of their race, class, and gender. This exclusion included people of color, lower class citizens, and women. Race was an ongoing struggle sinceRead MoreThe West Between The Wars1186 Words   |  5 Pagesunemployment sky-rocketed. The recession did not last very long, because there were new inventio ns and technology that were developed in the 1920s that helped create jobs for the unemployed. The Great Migration was the mass migration of African-Americans that left the South to work in the industry between 1915 and 1920. Russia was plagued with communists and had been taken over. The United States was afraid that communism would spread like wildfire, thus the Red Scare had taken control of the UnitedRead MoreThe Great Gatsby By F. Scott Fitzgerald1567 Words   |  7 Pageslooser, and the liquor was cheaper† (Fitzgerald 112, My Lost City). The 1920s was an innovated evolution, away from traditional morals of many Americans to those values less conservative and open-minded. F. Scott Fitzgerald’s, The Great Gatsby, and Ernest Hemingway’s, The Sun Also Rises, act as an exploration of Americans’ shift in values, post-World War One (WWI). These authors do so by commenting on the excessive partying and drinking, the falsification of relationships, and the l ost generation ofRead MoreThe Lost Generation844 Words   |  4 Pagesa group of writers who gained much popularity and grew in their literary expansion post WWI from 1918 through 1930. (Lost Generation) Prior to enlisting in the war, Americans were promised an upbringing of patriotism and honor for serving one’s country. They found returning home that the honor in which they believed to be fighting for was nothing more than witnessing innocent men killed. Upon returning back from WWI the image of patriotism and honor faded when the realism of the after effects of theRead MoreThe The Modern Temper 1124 Words   |  5 Pagesexpression and politics. Dumenil in her book â€Å"The Modern Temper† identifies and defines how modernism came about in the United States. Her thesis stipulated that through the rapid industrialization of the United States following the footsteps of WWI; the mass migration from Eastern Europe and the South to the industrial belt of the Midwest; and the expansion of urbanization (4) lead to the rise of modernism. Dumenil asserts throughout her book that the rejection that changing values and behaviorRead More World War I and The Literary Transition Into Modernism Essay961 Words   |  4 Pageswarfare. Due to the absolute horror of the violence, man became shell-shocked psychologically and disillusionment filled many people. The psychological effects of this conflict would alter world views for years to come, especially as recorded in the post-war literature. This cultural report will briefly discuss the historical circumstances of the war, its violent resolution, and the effects of its horror as felt in the literary world, specifically through modernism and Edith Wharton’s novel TheRead MoreThe First Glimpse Of Globalization1573 Words   |  7 Pagesand European languages were ancillary products of the time. The countries contributing to the modern economy were positively affected as well through the insight and influence that the expeditions had on European thought, culture, government and society. Moreover, this era irrevocably altered the destiny of people, such as relocating and circulating the global population and spreading of disease. Likewise, the rise of the 20th century dramatically transformed humankind. Globalization spurred drasticRead MoreErnest Hemingway s `` Indian Camp `` And Hills Like White Elephants ``928 Words   |  4 Pagesout of ignorance. Bauer specifies that the man must be appealing to the idea of the abortion because he is not prepared to settle down with a family. In fact, as this takes place following WWI and the man is identified as â€Å"the American†, Bauer even suggests that he is a former soldier and is suffering with post-traumatic stress disorder- a common theme in Hemingway’s work. Upon reviewing this article, I predominantly agreed with Dr. Bauer’s observations and criticisms about â€Å"Hills Like White Elephants†Read MorePatriarchal Society : An Critique Of The Environmental Influence Of Gender Bias973 Words   |  4 PagesPatriarchal Society: An Analysis of the Environmental Influence of Gender Bias in Advertisements This study will define the environmental influence of patriarchal societal values on women that create an undue gender bias in popular culture. In â€Å"Sex and Molecules†, the narrow view of sex identity through a â€Å"scientific† view of biology defines the limitations of gender roles in a patriarchal society: â€Å"And â€Å"biology† excludes the dynamic interweaving of our physical beings with our experience withinRead MoreThe War That Transformed The World2362 Words   |  10 Pagesdevastation in their societies and economies. World War I was a completely transformational war for the world and led to significant changes in many societies and governments. World War I was unlike any other war before it because it fostered the introduction of new weapons and technology that made war deadlier than ever before. Before WWI, the primary weapons used during battle were rifles, cannons, and some automatic weapons. However, they weren’t nearly as well developed as the weapons of WWI. Some of the

How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam Free Essays

Sources A-C gives us some insight into why the USA fought and got involved in Vietnam and reveals a number of reasons about Vietnam. I shall be reviewing each source from which I have stated above. Sources A, B and C. We will write a custom essay sample on How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam? or any similar topic only for you Order Now Source A is a primary public speech made by President Johnson (Lyndon Baines Johnson) in April 1965 just one month after the start of ‘Operation Rolling Thunder’ helping to stop communism according to the provenance. In the speech Johnson is stating in the source, I quote â€Å"We fight in Vietnam because we have a promise to keep†. By this statement indeed Johnson did want his opinions to be heard and notified by his fellow American citizens, so they shall believe every word that comes out of Johnson’s mouth. This was due to a promise being made by President Eisenhower when he was elected president in the year of 1953. Lyndon Johnson wishes all the Americans to trust in what he is saying to be 100% truthful and is trying to carry on regarding the promise made by Eisenhower and earn everyone’s respect. The ‘Truman Doctrine’ was also mentioned about. This is a list of every American President who had been elected in year 1948 to agree with a various amount of promises which they written then had to sign. Truman Doctrine was a promise they were fighting for â€Å"promised to help when there are any threats of communism†. So Johnson decided he wanted to do the same thing, so he signed and agreed once president. In the year of 1954, President Eisenhower and JFK started transporting â€Å"advisers† as the first president Kennedy would have wanted. From the tone of Johnson’s words in the speech, you can tell he jus maybe talking in a religious manner and might even be a religious person within the speech. President Lyndon Johnson wants to reassure every single American citizen about the â€Å"Domino Theory†. This was a theory of a mid-20th century foreign policy theory. The title ‘Domino’ is given to this theory because it can end up like a stack of dominos. This is because if you let one country fall to communism then each over country around that county would then soon follow falling one to another and become communism itself and Johnson was petrified of this happening. Lyndon Johnson is trying to make everyone go and fight in the Vietnam War. As most of the American citizens believed this is what would eventually happen if just one country did fall to communism and it’s why Johnson is trying to justify himself. In the year of 1945 nearly all of all the American leaders all offered to help and give their own support of the Vietnam War. President Eisenhower was a well respected and great general of the war. There was one thing which was expected to be achieved or aimed said by President Johnson in the speech, I quote â€Å"the independence of the South and the freedom of the people of South Vietnam to guide their own country in their own way’. The Americans also think that they’re available to strengthen â€Å"world order† because the U.S.A as democratic wanting to stop communism. Although there were two countries that relied on the Americans if they were at any point attacked which were ‘Thailand’ and ‘Berlin’. If Vietnam was left to fight for itself, then it would increasingly look terrible on some of the promises which the Americans agreed with, due to American’s believing it was their duty and their own right to fight for Vietnam. Johnson implied, I quote â€Å"to leave Vietnam to its fate would shake the value of an American commitment and in the value of America’s word. The result would be instability and unrest, and even wider war†. I could say this source is being very biased, due to because Johnson is only giving his own opinion on what the American citizens want to hear, whilst he is keeping his real thoughts inside and not expressing his personal opinions. The source can be seen quite useful, but has limitations, as I have stated, it’s a public speech where Johnson isn’t really voicing his truths about what he thinks of Vietnam. To look at Johnson’s person views, then I can begin to study source B. Source B is a private primary speech made by President Johnson in May 1964 according to the provenance. At this point in time, Lyndon Baines Johnson was only just elected president. With Johnson being V.P. (Vice President) he knew a lot regarding Vietnam and knew how everything worked. Lyndon Johnson became the thirty-seventh Vice President in the years from and to 1963-1965. Johnson was one of the major leaders of the ‘Democratic Party’. Also Lyndon Johnson was the one who were in charge of creating the â€Å"Great Society†. President Lyndon Baines in this private speech is discussing a number of things which includes criticizing most of his very own American citizens. I quote â€Å"I don’t think the people of our country know much about Vietnam, and I think we care a hell of a lot less†. From Johnson stating these words, he is blatantly calling most of the American citizens dumb, thick and lack of knowledge about the Vietnam. With Johnson saying this, he has a very low profile on the American citizens and implies that the U.S.A cannot win the war. In public no-one would use the word â€Å"hell† like Johnson did in the speech, due to it being a southern religious Texan society which always stayed faithful and don’t appreciate foul language such as swearing. Speaking in Private Johnson doesn’t care what he is implying and doesn’t have to bite his tongue to try and stop himself from voicing his very own opinions like he does when speaking out in public. As Johnson knows that none of the American citizens shall hear what he really thinks about them. In this source President Johnson is really voicing his opinions. You know this by Johnson saying, I quote â€Å"I don’t think we can fight them ten thousand miles away from home, I don’t think it’s worth fighting for. What the hell is Vietnam worth to me?† Johnson is agreeing that the U.S.A need to stand up to communism, as Johnson is terrified of communism. Although, he is trying to get his personal views across which is stating Vietnam is not worth anything at all. It’s like Lyndon Johnson isn’t really concerned and couldn’t care less about his people and about the Vietnam War. It’s showing us that Johnson is scared and has fears of communism taking over the world as states and that the political consideration â€Å"Let’s move on, let’s go into the North† are just being selfish. We have to be very suspicious within this speech, as it hasn’t been edited or tampered with and indeed if it’s all whole trustworthy. Possibly was it taped? As it has been to believed that since President Johnson been president in the white house his office was monitored by everything that had been said by recorders. But is this really reliable and exactly what U.S.A. President Lyndon Baines Johnson really said? As I have stated before it can be edited in various ways making things sound different from what has actually been said, which could make this source a limitation. Source C is a secondary speech of a modern writer interview with Professor Noam Chomsky, an American critic of the war in October 1982 according to the provenance underneath the extract. The interview is talking about political reasons of the U.S.A and how they went to war which was to dominate Vietnam. Also to discontinue South Vietnam from independence and indeed there was an attack on South Vietnam from the U.S.A. Professor Noam Chomsky says, I quote, â€Å"The U.S. did not want an independent South Vietnam that was no longer dominated by America. It feared that South Vietnam might be able to reform and improve itself – develop it’s economy- and that might work†. Chomsky is being biased due to him being an anti-American, and is therefore being biased towards the American country. To sum up the conclusion of sources A-C all have value and limitations. In my view source B is most useful as it’s a private speech where Johnson is criticizing most of his own American citizens by using negative comments and is saying what he really thinks about Vietnam along with the citizens plus America. Once this private speech with Johnson’s personal opinions and views about Vietnam, the tape was then exposed to everyone. Therefore source B is definitely the most useful out of them all. How to cite How Useful Are Sources A to C To Explain Why The United States Became Involved In The War In Vietnam?, Essays

Symbols for Vendetta free essay sample

A symbol, in and of itself is powerless, but with enough people behind it, blowing up a building can change the world† (V, 2006). The movie V for Vendetta is set in present day London. Although the events which take place in the movie have no historical context, they are still relatable to modern day issues regarding government. The movie presents one of the main characters Evey, as a common person who is afraid and can’t act on her own decisions, which makes the movie relatable to the audience today. There are a lot of symbols used to portray the various themes of the movie. Specifically, the portrayal of democracy is achieved through symbols such as the constant appearance of â€Å"v†, Norsefire which is the group controlling the government, the roses, Evey and her role in the final event and V himself. The letter â€Å"v† which also is the Roman numeral 5, is constantly brought on to the movie along with the number five. We will write a custom essay sample on Symbols for Vendetta or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In the very first scenes of the movie, V gives a monologue which is packed with words that all start with the letter â€Å"v†. His speech describes his ideas and plans to take down the government which is now corrupt and controls every aspect of the people’s lives. November the 5th, which is overly emphasized in the movie, represents V’s struggle for democracy. November 5th is a holiday for Guy Fawkes, who died in his attempt to overthrow corrupt government. This idea of striving for democracy, by tying V’s actions into Guy Fawkes’ ideas, is represented throughout the movie by the constant use of the number 5 and â€Å"v†. Beethoven’s Fifth symphony, the V on his cell at Larkhill, the overuse of â€Å"November the 5th†, and V’s identification of himself as just â€Å"V†, all symbolize V’s ideas and actions of overthrowing the totalitarian government. Norsefire is the group who controls the government in the movie. How Norsefire came into power is later shown in the movie, which is one of the main reasons for V’s vengeance. The Norsefire emblem is the Cross of Lorraine, which is a symbol for patriotism. The red cross symbolizes the government’s tyranny and bloodshed. Norsefire is shown as being against things such as art, music, and homosexuality; things that encourage free thinking. The idea of totalitarian government is also seen through the â€Å"fingermen† who enforce curfews and the media control through â€Å"The Voice of London†. All of these things symbolize tyranny and the people’s fear of acting out against it. Because these symbols emphasize the totalitarian government, they contrast the ideas of democracy in return, making it more evident in the movie. An important and emphasized symbol in the movie is the constant use of roses. Roses are a universal symbol for love and beauty. Most important to the context of the movie is the rose as a symbol of social democracy. V gives a rose to every person he kills, the people who all had a part in corrupting the government, as well as killing thousands of innocent people. This symbolizes V’s attempt at trying to achieve justice for the people. In the movie, the government controls everything and restricts the expression of different ideas by the people. Since the rose is a symbol of social democracy, its use in the movie could be for representing the ideals of democracy. The roses are also a way of V justifying his murderous actions and showing that he has a higher sense of purpose than just creating terror. All of these symbols combined leads to the rand theme/symbol of the movie. V himself is a symbol of the ideas of democracy. In his last fighting scene V says, â€Å"Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy, and ideas are bulletproof. † V himself is a representation of the ideas of democracy and justice. Even though V dies, the idea which he came to identify himself with lives on with Evey and the rest of the people as Evey says, â€Å"He was Edmond Dantes, and he was my father, and my mother, my brother, my friend. He was you and me. He was all of us. †